WH
Well, one of the first things the BBC did was grab a couple of ladies from the Brexit rally in Parliament Square and asked them what they wanted from Brexit, and when the answer they gave wasn't good enough, the reporter proceeded to try and skew them for more detail. The sort of detail they would never demand of a Remain voter.
The rest of their coverage dwelt on the fact that nothing has changed and the focus of concern moved to 31st December, and all the problems that could occur then if we don't get a trade deal.
I didn't see the clip you mention but with regard to the latter points, the news is there to provide analysis and explanation. Nothing has really changed as EU law continues to apply, the big changes will indeed come on the 31st December and if there's no trade deal then it's widely accepted there will be consequences. So which bit of this did you take exception to?
Bias can exist in coverage even if it is factually accurate. The coverage as a whole has felt skewed, not helped by the camera cutting to the studio too soon after a clip of the pro-Brexit rally were played.
Perhaps her look of disdain was unrelated, but her expression changed pretty sharpish once she realised she was on air.
That's my opinion, and I am someone that has vehemently defended the BBC's political coverage in the past.
Whataday
Founding member
Well, one of the first things the BBC did was grab a couple of ladies from the Brexit rally in Parliament Square and asked them what they wanted from Brexit, and when the answer they gave wasn't good enough, the reporter proceeded to try and skew them for more detail. The sort of detail they would never demand of a Remain voter.
The rest of their coverage dwelt on the fact that nothing has changed and the focus of concern moved to 31st December, and all the problems that could occur then if we don't get a trade deal.
I didn't see the clip you mention but with regard to the latter points, the news is there to provide analysis and explanation. Nothing has really changed as EU law continues to apply, the big changes will indeed come on the 31st December and if there's no trade deal then it's widely accepted there will be consequences. So which bit of this did you take exception to?
Bias can exist in coverage even if it is factually accurate. The coverage as a whole has felt skewed, not helped by the camera cutting to the studio too soon after a clip of the pro-Brexit rally were played.

Perhaps her look of disdain was unrelated, but her expression changed pretty sharpish once she realised she was on air.
That's my opinion, and I am someone that has vehemently defended the BBC's political coverage in the past.