With all this talk of saving money, why don't they bring back UK Today. Bring all the top stories from across the nations and regions together and use the resources they already have.
UK Today existed purely because there was a need to fill the regional slots on the early digital services (which had no English regional variations at all). It used the existing News 24 production team to pull together reports from around the regions. Once English regions started opting on
DTT, it existed just for DSAT but was dropped when DSAT English regions started. So it didn't cost
that
much money, the reports were being made anyway for regional use and the crew and production team were in place for News 24.
Anyway, history aside, there have been repeated calls over the years for regional resources to be used more effectively across the network, which is entirely sensible on the face of it. It's completely understandable to a casual observer as to why itv send one reporter and the BBC send 3 (plus crews and producers and occasionally more than one live vehicle). Yet actually, the demands of network broadcasting, regional tv and local radio are often very different with have different deadlines. However often with big stories regions will get there first and provide initial coverage to the news channel and network radio. If the story is big enough, network will often send a network reporter or correspondent and perhaps a satellite truck to take over. This actually frees up the regional reporter to work on the local angle and sometimes relieves the regional crew to do other things for the regional programme. It's the best of both worlds as you will get a national angle on the story on the Six and a more local angle, presented by a local reporter on the regional 6:30 opt. They'll share material, edit facilities perhaps and crew but the way the story's told will be different. Yet on the face of it I can see why it looks like unnecessary duplication of resources.
Going back to UK Today though, with all regions available why would the news channel need to make the programme any more? In order to save money the news channel needs to make fewer programmes and sharing programmes with BBC World News (which also has to save money) is a way to achieve that. Sharing the new business programme, plus Outside Source does mean a lot less independent programming across the channels. After all the new proposals are fully in place, the news channel (if I've understood everything right) won't be showing anything independently from 1am until the early afternoon (overnights shared with World, breakfast shared with BBC One, business shared with World, Victoria Derbyshire shared with BBC Two, the One shared with BBC One). Now
that's
money saving.