A few years ago I used to wonder (and indeed comment on here) about the reasoning behind putting fairly low-ranking presenters on the overnight simulcast shift, usually as cover (I'm thinking the likes of Janat Jalil, Susan Osman, Richard Forrest). As mentioned on here before, it's always primetime somewhere!
People generally don't like having to work in the middle of the night. If you're trying to climb the ladder you'll put up with it, if you don't have to you won't.
Jane Hill started on BBC News 24 as overnight presenter as did Joanna Gosling, they have both done well out of it.
Nevertheless, they weren't particularly senior presenters at the time and it's still likely an undesirable shift for many, if they had the choice.
And I guess it worked quite well for Martine Croxall... strike day presenter, then overnight presenter, now main presenters for BBC NC.
When did Martine break the picket line, and was she a regular presenter at the time?
A few years ago I used to wonder (and indeed comment on here) about the reasoning behind putting fairly low-ranking presenters on the overnight simulcast shift, usually as cover (I'm thinking the likes of Janat Jalil, Susan Osman, Richard Forrest). As mentioned on here before, it's always primetime somewhere!
Presumably because relatively few presenters with any experience and skill are prepared to cover overnight shifts on, presumably, a freelance basis. It's one thing not knowing if you'll be working on Thursday morning or Sunday evening, I suspect it's quite another having to plan your life around last minute overnight shifts. I'm sure the same goes for production and crew too (though I suppose it doesn't matter if they have huge bags under their eyes and are shaking from the caffeine, as know one outside will know).
It was fantastic. Really interesting interviewee and delivered with lots of enthusiasm. And it was very funny too! Fantastic reports, wasn't going badly at all.
Oh I thought it made for great television, and I'm a big fan of Chris Eakin. But pausing the interview, about a relatively serious topic, to explain that the steam train has to travel on a second line to move to the back of the train - irrelevant to the discussion of shutting down huge parts of a transport infrastructure fifty years earlier - probably won't win any journalistic awards.
Still, he managed to make what could otherwise have been a pretty boring report really quite entertaining.