Media Websites

bbc.co.uk

(September 2006)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
FI
fireworks
The new BBC Wildlife Finder website is online - in the new GVL-style. I assume this is actually a GVL site, and not another 'nod' towards one? It looks really well.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/wildlifefinder/

The blog post on the BBC Internet Blog is here - http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2010/09/improvements_to_wildlife_finde.html
HO
House
The new BBC Wildlife Finder website is online - in the new GVL-style. I assume this is actually a GVL site, and not another 'nod' towards one? It looks really well.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/wildlifefinder/

The blog post on the BBC Internet Blog is here - http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2010/09/improvements_to_wildlife_finde.html


Thanks for posting that, Fireworks. The only parts that I really don't like on that site (and this is minor, I know) are the squares under the main carousel/ featured area at the top - they don't fit in with that site or the GVL, it seems - and the < and > arrows on the smaller carousels, which seem too thin. It's also rather green, and could perhaps do with some more photos or colours to liven up the background.

Otherwise not bad, and given it's launched with the new masthead, can we assume it's proper GVL 3.0?
JA
james
Just a quick question about BBC iPlayer. I don't use it very often but whilst watching the BBC Four Corrie program it kept jumping between a version of the programme with the BBC Four D.O.G and continuity at the end and a online version with the standard BBC D.O.G and no continuity. It seemed to change when it was buffering. It just seems odd why they have to versions of the same video and why it switches. Is one a backup of the programme recorded off air? Anyone have any ideas?
JO
Joe
I suspect one is a lower bandwidth version - why there are differences I don't know, but I would guess that one is encoded at a much lower bitrate and that it is easier to do this from a separate source.
JA
james
I suspect one is a lower bandwidth version - why there are differences I don't know, but I would guess that one is encoded at a much lower bitrate and that it is easier to do this from a separate source.


That's probably the answer as the BBC Four recorded one was lower quality than the iPlayer version.
DD
DarkestDreams
Um, is the BBC News website in the UK supposed to be showing Ads by Google? I'm currently seeing them on all pages, using a UK based ISP.
HO
House
Um, is the BBC News website in the UK supposed to be showing Ads by Google? I'm currently seeing them on all pages, using a UK based ISP.


I can't see any here, so I suspect they're misinterpreting your IP address (or at least its location).
MO
Moz
Anyone else think the banner images on the BBC frontpage have gone downhill since the new(ish) look?

They used to be beautifully crafted, clever, pictures that grabbed the attention. Now they seem very amateur.

This for example - using a very standard font which is badly aliased...

http://static.bbc.co.uk/homepage/ic/mediazone/strap/www/image/p00b9w9z_640_215.jpg

And this - a very shoddy shadow effect and again a standard font...

http://static.bbc.co.uk/homepage/ic/mediazone/strap/www/image/p00b9t9j_640_215.jpg
AN
andyface
Totally agree - it happened with the last design aswell, when it first launched they put a lot of thought into them, with some of them breaking out of the box. But that went downhill really quickly when somebody discovered a horrible grunge-y font that seemed to be used all the time. Strange to think how long ago that was.
Can't wait for the new homepage in truth - this screams stopgap to me.
MO
Moz
Totally agree - it happened with the last design aswell, when it first launched they put a lot of thought into them, with some of them breaking out of the box. But that went downhill really quickly when somebody discovered a horrible grunge-y font that seemed to be used all the time. Strange to think how long ago that was.
Can't wait for the new homepage in truth - this screams stopgap to me.

Yep - the ones that broke out of the box were sometimes very clever. Here's a quite good example...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/ipm/images/bbcbeta.gif

Another disappointment today...

http://static.bbc.co.uk/homepage/ic/mediazone/strap/www/image/p00b9yxn_640_215.jpg
DV
DVB Cornwall
Getting more and more teasy over the random sign outs by their single sign on process.
AL
altrus
Totally agree - it happened with the last design aswell, when it first launched they put a lot of thought into them, with some of them breaking out of the box. But that went downhill really quickly when somebody discovered a horrible grunge-y font that seemed to be used all the time. Strange to think how long ago that was.
Can't wait for the new homepage in truth - this screams stopgap to me.


That grunge-y font was actually some sort of Doctor Who font.

Newer posts