DE
I can see what you mean and obviously that is a huge problem but what is he point in allowing branding to slide on top of that if they are consistent with the name. I personally don't like it being called "channel 5" and have always said it was best "five" but if they are going to inject money and time into making it the first then they should stick by it. This is of course if Viacom haven't fully taken over and are beginning to take it back to pre-2011.
I think they have more important things to worry about, like the loss of £30 million in advertising revenue.
I can see what you mean and obviously that is a huge problem but what is he point in allowing branding to slide on top of that if they are consistent with the name. I personally don't like it being called "channel 5" and have always said it was best "five" but if they are going to inject money and time into making it the first then they should stick by it. This is of course if Viacom haven't fully taken over and are beginning to take it back to pre-2011.