SN
Well. I am astounded.
That accusation has never before been levelled at a man of my good character.
I wasn't aiming the accusation at your fineself...Its me that has trouble keeping a lid on my thoughts. I think its the weather...its bought it out in me. Either that or you c@t.
c@t posted:
Snu posted:
This could descend into smut news.
Well. I am astounded.
That accusation has never before been levelled at a man of my good character.
I wasn't aiming the accusation at your fineself...Its me that has trouble keeping a lid on my thoughts. I think its the weather...its bought it out in me. Either that or you c@t.
DU
Littlejohn finally sacked (sorry- "parts company") by Sky News:
Media Guardian- free registration required
Interesting that Dawn Airey is going to launch a "new evening schedule" for Sky News- good to see Mr Pollard has as much influence as ever!
Media Guardian- free registration required
Interesting that Dawn Airey is going to launch a "new evening schedule" for Sky News- good to see Mr Pollard has as much influence as ever!
CA
Just means the channel is going to become more Fox-Newsy.
I suggest that by Airey coming in to revamp the evening schedule (which I presume will not launch until the new building does, whenever that is) means it is going to be more infotainment than rolling news.
Good points and bad points to that. Is going to be more Americanised, one assumes, so more glitzy and snazzy looking, and in truth I'd much rather have that than the boring news 30 minutes they have in the evenings at the moment. BUT I hope it doesn't dilute the rest of the coverage.
The problem with Fox is that it started of with a blurred distinction between news and talk. I hope that Sky manage to make that a little sharper. There's definately a place for talk/analysis shows, especially in the evening... but as long as it doesn't impact on the rest of the real rolling news.
Important question being: who's going to be presenting? Surely are going to have to hire a raft of new people to front a line up of new shows.
I suggest that by Airey coming in to revamp the evening schedule (which I presume will not launch until the new building does, whenever that is) means it is going to be more infotainment than rolling news.
Good points and bad points to that. Is going to be more Americanised, one assumes, so more glitzy and snazzy looking, and in truth I'd much rather have that than the boring news 30 minutes they have in the evenings at the moment. BUT I hope it doesn't dilute the rest of the coverage.
The problem with Fox is that it started of with a blurred distinction between news and talk. I hope that Sky manage to make that a little sharper. There's definately a place for talk/analysis shows, especially in the evening... but as long as it doesn't impact on the rest of the real rolling news.
Important question being: who's going to be presenting? Surely are going to have to hire a raft of new people to front a line up of new shows.
