NG
that said, there is one thing that intrigues me ... why aren't channel tv and utv following suit? obviously there's an element of not biting the hand that feeds you, but there must be other factors.
Don't know about UTV - but Channel are very reliant on the ITV South feed I believe - so that they don't have to run a 24/7 presentation operation. Although they now have a fibre, rather than off-air analogue, feed from the UK, I believe they still rely on the ITV South feed - including regional presentation and ad breaks - to sustain them off-peak - and don't replace every commercial etc., and in return ITV pay them money for the adverts shown in the ITV South region that are also re-broadcast in the Channel Islands region?
I suspect the amount Channel are expected to pay to show ITV Plc networked programmes like The Bill, Kingdom etc. is much, much smaller than the amount STV pay for the STV/Grampian regions, and probably compares favourably with the cost of buying in their own replacements (they aren't going to be able to afford to make replacements) AND running a playout operation to play them, and more/different commercials, out?
There is also the argument about cultural differences. Scotland audiences have quite different viewing patterns to English audiences - with some shows that are popular in England not rating as well in Scotland. I suspect - based on absolutely no evidence (!) - that the viewing patterns in the Channel Islands are closer to that of England - so the arguments that some programmes have been dropped in Scotland because they aren't getting the audiences that their cost demands may not be valid in the Channel TV regions.
In other words, Channel TV may make enough in advertising revenue from the popular networked shows to cover their licensing costs because although they are pro-rata expensive, they are also pro-rata popular. STV's argument has partially been that some of the high-end ITV PLC stuff is being licensed pro-rata expensive, but doesn't rate as well in Scotland as England, so they make less money when they show it in Scotland... They've used this as an argument to reduce their licensing costs for some shows, it hasn't worked, so they've ditched the content.
I don't know how ratings in Northern Ireland compare to ratings in England for given shows, and also Northern Ireland is a smaller territory, and it may not be in their interest to leave the network? SMG has a bigger back catalogue of shows AIUI, and may have more deals with other distributors?
noggin
Founding member
that said, there is one thing that intrigues me ... why aren't channel tv and utv following suit? obviously there's an element of not biting the hand that feeds you, but there must be other factors.
Don't know about UTV - but Channel are very reliant on the ITV South feed I believe - so that they don't have to run a 24/7 presentation operation. Although they now have a fibre, rather than off-air analogue, feed from the UK, I believe they still rely on the ITV South feed - including regional presentation and ad breaks - to sustain them off-peak - and don't replace every commercial etc., and in return ITV pay them money for the adverts shown in the ITV South region that are also re-broadcast in the Channel Islands region?
I suspect the amount Channel are expected to pay to show ITV Plc networked programmes like The Bill, Kingdom etc. is much, much smaller than the amount STV pay for the STV/Grampian regions, and probably compares favourably with the cost of buying in their own replacements (they aren't going to be able to afford to make replacements) AND running a playout operation to play them, and more/different commercials, out?
There is also the argument about cultural differences. Scotland audiences have quite different viewing patterns to English audiences - with some shows that are popular in England not rating as well in Scotland. I suspect - based on absolutely no evidence (!) - that the viewing patterns in the Channel Islands are closer to that of England - so the arguments that some programmes have been dropped in Scotland because they aren't getting the audiences that their cost demands may not be valid in the Channel TV regions.
In other words, Channel TV may make enough in advertising revenue from the popular networked shows to cover their licensing costs because although they are pro-rata expensive, they are also pro-rata popular. STV's argument has partially been that some of the high-end ITV PLC stuff is being licensed pro-rata expensive, but doesn't rate as well in Scotland as England, so they make less money when they show it in Scotland... They've used this as an argument to reduce their licensing costs for some shows, it hasn't worked, so they've ditched the content.
I don't know how ratings in Northern Ireland compare to ratings in England for given shows, and also Northern Ireland is a smaller territory, and it may not be in their interest to leave the network? SMG has a bigger back catalogue of shows AIUI, and may have more deals with other distributors?