i'm still waiting for a moderator to tell me exactly why calling kitty dull is worthy of a warning, i know this place should be called www.kittystvhomeforumdontupsetheroryou'llgetaslappedarse.co.uk but i do find it amazing how she appears to rule the place with a rod of ritalin
i do find it amazing how she appears to rule the place with a rod of ritalin
I don't - Asa and the Mods run this place and I'm bound to honour the Behaviour Guidelines I agreed to when I signed up to this place as best as I humanly can.
I know some people (Peter Levy and Paul Hudson possibly....) who think a dose of Ritalin might do me some good......
Doesn't Ritalin play for Norwich? Ad a go - JDK, read the post you did about Look East, 2-0 was it to West Ham? Sad, I suport Ipswich as well, as well as Grimsby....
No that's Huckerby - which I always thought was a closed station on the Louth-Thorpe Culvert section. Damn Dr Beeching!!!!!
Shame about Ipswich. Although I got wound upabout Norwich, I've got to say that the fly past with 9 Jaguars was impressive!!!!!
Please, Tom Ingall was no good on Calendar South and he appears to be even worse on Look Leeds. Please will somebody put Levy back to lunchtime. It's one of the few times I can actually stomach Look North in full, and as I've said before, he's actually a decent chap.[/quote]
You cad - I am undone.
Oh - Calendar South. Great days.
I believe her [Sophie's] problem might get better if she takes a mixture of Vitamin B6 and Evening Primrose Oil, dry extract of Agnus Castus, reduces her salt intake, raises her slow-release carbohydrate foodstuff consumption and consults her doctor about starting a course of Cilest tablets. We will pray for the start of her mellowing out in the meantime.... it's a common problem kid......
What the hell is that about? I'm sorry to mire myself in this, but how come Kat can say things like that yet complains when she is called dull?
No offence, dear, but your comments about keeping the house clean and seeing Red Arrow displays
was
dull.
Will I also be banned? This is ludicrous. Sophie really wasn't that wide of the mark, was she?
Maybe you could have considered that before posting yesterday then?
Aston posted:
YTVsophie posted:
yes yes yes kitty, so you lead a full and varied life (although keeping the house tidy (regardless of where you parents are) is something most of us have to do every day, maybe when you're old enough to leave home and get a job you'll see that. hold on, i know why the house is a mess, its because you keep throwing your toys out of the pram isnt it!!!!)
<sigh>
Yes, well done Soph (can I call you that?) , another put-down of Katherine.
It's NOT wearing thin at all now.
Sophie didn't go OTT there - certainly no worse than I have said to others; so why comment, Aston? Could you explain what was wrong with what was said?
In fact, could a moderator please explain who made a complaint which led to Sophie's banning?
Maybe you could have considered that before posting yesterday then?
Aston posted:
YTVsophie posted:
yes yes yes kitty, so you lead a full and varied life (although keeping the house tidy (regardless of where you parents are) is something most of us have to do every day, maybe when you're old enough to leave home and get a job you'll see that. hold on, i know why the house is a mess, its because you keep throwing your toys out of the pram isnt it!!!!)
<sigh>
Yes, well done Soph (can I call you that?) , another put-down of Katherine.
It's NOT wearing thin at all now.
Sophie didn't go OTT there - certainly no worse than I have said to others; so why comment, Aston? Could you explain what was wrong with what was said?
In fact, could a moderator please explain who made a complaint which led to Sophie's banning?
I think it's clear from my first post that Sophie's rablings were wearing thin and were quite repetative (not the only one on the forum). However, when she wasn't letting off steam she had the potential to be a good contributor.
I think it's clear from my first post that Sophie's rablings were wearing thin and were quite repetative (not the only one on the forum). However, when she wasn't letting off steam she had the potential to be a good contributor.
Never anywhere did I say she should be banned...
Fair enough you didn't.
Its hardly fair though to subjectively rate one persons posts as, "has potential", when other members escape such ratings. This is like Batstope and his monthly forum reviews.
You only have to look through Sophie's posts - nearly every one contains some kind of dig at Katherine.
Whatever the rights and wrongs of anything Katherine may have posted, I am sure I am not the only one to have found the constant sneering and belittling tone of Sophie's messages about Katherine to be quite unnecessary and sometimes just plain nasty and bullying. Her messages were designed to pick a fight, plain and simple.
I really can't have much sympathy for someone who plainly gets a kick out of putting other people down and revelling in how 'sad' someone else supposedly is. Now that's what I call tragic.