TV Home Forum

Channel Television during the 1979 ITV Strike

How did it continue broadcasting? (June 2019)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
BU
buster
To be a bit picky the 1987/1988 TV-am industrial dispute was not a strike as such. There was a one day strike done by the union ACTT on Monday 23rd November 1987, and they were are expecting to return to work the following day, however TV-am MD Bruce Gyngell decided that anyone who went out on strike on that day would never return, and on the following morning he locked them all out.

The ensuing debacle was not a strike, as the workers were all willing to come back in, however they were locked out, as Gyngell had enough of the power of the ACTT union and wanted to teach them a lesson, which he did.

The first week or so without the main staff saw TV-am really reduced to showing non stop cartoons, Flipper, Batman, Happy Days, literally anything they could get to fill the three and half hours, alongside studio links and the odd news headlines with no video reports.

Gradually by December 1988 they managed to coax a number of main staff back who broke the picket line, and they produced a reduced version of Good Morning Britain from 8.00am, with the remainder of the morning the usual bag of cartoons and US imports, mashed together with repeats of interviews and segments they had in their archive.

Gradually too the TV-am newsroom could provide more news coverage, with access to certain news agency reports and videos from other sources.

All this led to Gyngell sacking the 200 or so ACTT members by the Spring of 1988 and hiring non-union staff from UK and Australia. Gyngell won, and the unions knew that their stranglehold on ITV was over. No more 1979 style strikes.



In the book "Morning Glory" part of the strike service was an interview at 8.30 by Anne Diamond. She slept in the house TVAM had on the premises. (Does anyone know anything about that house?)


Not unheard of in this era for the franchises to have some sort of executive flat on the premises - I think Granada had a penthouse flat at the top of the Quay St office block.
CO
commseng
It wasn't just in ITV either.
Over the road from Broadcasting House in No. 1 Duchess Street (where a load of Communications Engineers worked) was the DG's flat.
BL
bluecortina
Odd that ITV did not attempt an emergency service with non-union staffers (members of the management, etc.). Isn't that what TV-AM essentially did just a decade later? If nothing else, they could have just shown reruns.

If all else failed, they could have at least distributed Channel Television's bare-bones service nationwide to get some advertising revenue.


No. ITV management WANTED blank screens so that it would hack the general public off so seemingly increasing the pressure on the ACTT to settle. They didn't want some sort of novelty service.
MA
Markymark
Odd that ITV did not attempt an emergency service with non-union staffers (members of the management, etc.). Isn't that what TV-AM essentially did just a decade later? If nothing else, they could have just shown reruns.

If all else failed, they could have at least distributed Channel Television's bare-bones service nationwide to get some advertising revenue.


No. ITV management WANTED blank screens so that it would hack the general public off so seemingly increasing the pressure on the ACTT to settle. They didn't want some sort of novelty service.


The IBA were the broadcaster though, the ITV companies were only ‘programme contractors’ so the IBA were within their rights to provide a programme service ?
CO
commseng
How could the IBA have done so though?
They didn't have any of their own facilities or staff to do that - not of the scale needed.
Plus politically it would have been a nightmare for them.
Much easier to sit back, and let the ITV companies sort it out.
NL
Ne1L C
This from Wikipedia:

" The IBA appointed and regulated a number of regional programme TV contractors and local radio contractors, and built and operated the network of transmitters distributing these programmes through its Engineering Division. It established and part-funded a National Broadcasting School to train on-air and engineering staff. "

Regulated as opposed to control so CTV broadcast through the transmitters on Alderney et al but the IBA couldn't do anything about the actual programming unless of courses there was anything illegal eg actual crime or P**n being transmitted
MA
Markymark
This from Wikipedia:

" The IBA appointed and regulated a number of regional programme TV contractors and local radio contractors, and built and operated the network of transmitters distributing these programmes through its Engineering Division. It established and part-funded a National Broadcasting School to train on-air and engineering staff. "

Regulated as opposed to control so CTV broadcast through the transmitters on Alderney et al but the IBA couldn't do anything about the actual programming unless of courses there was anything illegal eg actual crime or P**n being transmitted


That’s not quite the case, don’t believe everything you read on Wiki, the IBA had a much firmer grip on things, approved all the programme schedules for starters, and could even comment on the companies’board of directors to an extent I think?

Regulator is the wrong word to describe them really
MA
Markymark
How could the IBA have done so though?
They didn't have any of their own facilities or staff to do that - not of the scale needed.
Plus politically it would have been a nightmare for them.
Much easier to sit back, and let the ITV companies sort it out.


Oh I agree, but that said wasn’t the emergency 1968 service initiated by the ITA ?
SW
Steve Williams
It wasn't just in ITV either.
Over the road from Broadcasting House in No. 1 Duchess Street (where a load of Communications Engineers worked) was the DG's flat.


And when Radio 4 announcers did the night shift, there was a (supposedly haunted) room at the Langham Hotel available for them to sleep between the midnight and 6am bulletins.

According to Morning Glory the TV-am house was a proper two storey thing, but they were lavishing huge amounts on everything in the early days. They had a barge as well for entertaining, and Greg Dyke says in the documentary that when they were in dire financial straits, it was pretty much their only asset and he nicked the keys so that if it all went belly-up, he'd just sail away in it.

Famously Chris Evans stayed in the Big Breakfast house when he split up with his wife, what with it being an actual working house. He also says in his autobiography that Zig and Zag had managed to convince Planet 24 to rent an enormously swanky penthouse flat for them because they lived in Dublin the rest of the time, despite the fact they only came over every other weekend to pre-record a fortnight's worth of Crunches and went straight back home again.
mannewskev and Ne1L C gave kudos
NL
Ne1L C
This from Wikipedia:

" The IBA appointed and regulated a number of regional programme TV contractors and local radio contractors, and built and operated the network of transmitters distributing these programmes through its Engineering Division. It established and part-funded a National Broadcasting School to train on-air and engineering staff. "

Regulated as opposed to control so CTV broadcast through the transmitters on Alderney et al but the IBA couldn't do anything about the actual programming unless of courses there was anything illegal eg actual crime or P**n being transmitted


That’s not quite the case, don’t believe everything you read on Wiki, the IBA had a much firmer grip on things, approved all the programme schedules for starters, and could even comment on the companies’board of directors to an extent I think?

Regulator is the wrong word to describe them really


Actually now I think about it there was a interview with Lord Thomson on Storm in an eggcup about it being touch and go about tv am losing its licence.
BL
bluecortina
Odd that ITV did not attempt an emergency service with non-union staffers (members of the management, etc.). Isn't that what TV-AM essentially did just a decade later? If nothing else, they could have just shown reruns.

If all else failed, they could have at least distributed Channel Television's bare-bones service nationwide to get some advertising revenue.


No. ITV management WANTED blank screens so that it would hack the general public off so seemingly increasing the pressure on the ACTT to settle. They didn't want some sort of novelty service.


The IBA were the broadcaster though, the ITV companies were only ‘programme contractors’ so the IBA were within their rights to provide a programme service ?



The 1963 Television Act makes it quite clear that " .. the authority obtains its programmes through contracts with programme companies which derive their income from advertisements ..". I can't see the IBA pouring petrol on the flames of an already incendiary situation.
NL
Ne1L C
As far as I can recall the only programme the IBA made were the Engineering announcements.

Newer posts