MA
mannewskev
But if someone went to a party dressed as Rylan Clark-Neal and replicated his mannerisms, would that be homophobic?
Oh my God. Let it drop now. Blackface is wrong. End of.
:-(
A former member
But if someone went to a party dressed as Rylan Clark-Neal and replicated his mannerisms, would that be homophobic?
Oh my God. Let it drop now. Blackface is wrong. End of.
Why?
DB
Oh my God. Let it drop now. Blackface is wrong. End of.
Why?
Because it dehumanises black people, is it that hard to understand? I am black by the way.
But if someone went to a party dressed as Rylan Clark-Neal and replicated his mannerisms, would that be homophobic?
Oh my God. Let it drop now. Blackface is wrong. End of.
Why?
Because it dehumanises black people, is it that hard to understand? I am black by the way.
Last edited by dbl on 28 October 2018 6:00pm
WW
Oh my God. Let it drop now. Blackface is wrong. End of.
Why?
I refer you to several posts on page 22.
But if someone went to a party dressed as Rylan Clark-Neal and replicated his mannerisms, would that be homophobic?
Oh my God. Let it drop now. Blackface is wrong. End of.
Why?
I refer you to several posts on page 22.
MA
mannewskev
But if someone went to a party dressed as Rylan Clark-Neal and replicated his mannerisms, would that be homophobic?
Oh my God. Let it drop now. Blackface is wrong. End of.
Drop what? It was a genuine question in a reasonable debate.
Seriously. Enough now.
WW
Oh my God. Let it drop now. Blackface is wrong. End of.
Drop what? It was a genuine question in a reasonable debate.
It was also a question already answered many times in this thread (a thread about television news, by the way.)
But if someone went to a party dressed as Rylan Clark-Neal and replicated his mannerisms, would that be homophobic?
Oh my God. Let it drop now. Blackface is wrong. End of.
Drop what? It was a genuine question in a reasonable debate.
It was also a question already answered many times in this thread (a thread about television news, by the way.)
JK
One thing I don't get about Today's pres is why they attempt to create a seamless window by having a live feed of studio's view plastered onto the vertical screen that sits central behind the dek.
It just creates an unprofessional and disjointed look, and is made painfully obvious every time a vehicle passes. They've also just posted a clip to Twitter where a man's got a little too close to the camera.
Surely just having a branded graphic on the screen would look much better?
It just creates an unprofessional and disjointed look, and is made painfully obvious every time a vehicle passes. They've also just posted a clip to Twitter where a man's got a little too close to the camera.
Surely just having a branded graphic on the screen would look much better?