CW
I don't know, really it seemed a very ill thought out venture.
With the changes in ITN to being a news provider licenced to provide ITV News rather than being ITV's intrinsically inseparable news service, ITN had no devine right to promote their channel on any outlet, and as a result, it received no promotion at all (the ITVNC launched in mid-2000, almost a year after the ITN branding disappeared from ITV's news service)
Being an independent venture, it was always run on a shoestring budget, it had no possibility of growth since it had no promotion opportunities, nor could it afford any, and unless it was always intended to be launched as an interim ITV News Channel ahead of a purchase by Carlton/Granada and incorporate into the ITV brand, I don't know why they did it.
The channel itself reaked of underfunding, let alone the inability of ITN to arrange promotion elsewhere (i.e. they could have paid ITV/C4/C5 to enter a promo spot at the end of their respectice news bulletins - or at least booked some commercial airtime), and if it wasn't bought by Carlton and Granada, it would have collapsed by the end of 2002.
C&G (yes I know that acronym belongs to someone else) bought it as a cheap way of trying to restore their reputation after the worst year in ITV's history, so that they could be seen to have launched a new channel on the same year that ITV Digital collapsed, and as it was I didn't think it would last long. They do gradually seemed to have pumped more money into it, and it does now look like it might last and start to build.
cwathen
Founding member
Vaniliuz posted:
Well, thank you SO FAR
for your (plain) answers. But a new question has come up: why did ITN decide to start a news channel on its own while the UK already had BBC News 24 and Sky News?
I don't know, really it seemed a very ill thought out venture.
With the changes in ITN to being a news provider licenced to provide ITV News rather than being ITV's intrinsically inseparable news service, ITN had no devine right to promote their channel on any outlet, and as a result, it received no promotion at all (the ITVNC launched in mid-2000, almost a year after the ITN branding disappeared from ITV's news service)
Being an independent venture, it was always run on a shoestring budget, it had no possibility of growth since it had no promotion opportunities, nor could it afford any, and unless it was always intended to be launched as an interim ITV News Channel ahead of a purchase by Carlton/Granada and incorporate into the ITV brand, I don't know why they did it.
The channel itself reaked of underfunding, let alone the inability of ITN to arrange promotion elsewhere (i.e. they could have paid ITV/C4/C5 to enter a promo spot at the end of their respectice news bulletins - or at least booked some commercial airtime), and if it wasn't bought by Carlton and Granada, it would have collapsed by the end of 2002.
C&G (yes I know that acronym belongs to someone else) bought it as a cheap way of trying to restore their reputation after the worst year in ITV's history, so that they could be seen to have launched a new channel on the same year that ITV Digital collapsed, and as it was I didn't think it would last long. They do gradually seemed to have pumped more money into it, and it does now look like it might last and start to build.