DJ
Good - and thats what they should go back to now. The news bulletins were done properly then, with decent presenters not just chosen to make it seem equal (ie. Madame Raworth). All of the newsreaders had strong commading voices, and you could trust them.
The Nine o Clock News theme tune played - superbly orchestral powerful theme, and you knew you were going to get a half hour of in-depth, global, political, highbrow, important, commanding news. Now its Edwards plodding through the script, in an awful set, with relatively cheesy, tacky in house titles.
I agree also that any changes should be made all in one go, across the board. Not just tinkering with little bits one at time, then by the time you've finished, the tinkering starts back around again in another cycle. Total relaunches appear to be the best.
I agree. News should have authorative, uncluttered titles to grab attention, and only use graphics during the programme to improve clarity.
In terms of presentation, I think ard (the German BBC) has one of the best formulas: it uses a simple countdown and short authorative titles, and then plunges straight into the news. It is refreshingly informative because it is uncluttered and undistracting.
The programme also has continuity with the past, using the same theme since it's inception in the 1950's!
Also, presenters just wear smart business clothes and sit behing a desk - comfortable for the presenter, and easy for the viewer to watch - allowing the news to take precedence.
http://www.tagesschau.de/sendungen/0,1196,SPM7,00.html
Incidentally, I find it interesting that even the television presentation enthusiasts here find the style of BBC News overkill - god knows how the general population percieve it!
Well I am German and I do watch the "Tagesschau" very often. But I think its set and its titles are very old fashioned. The current look was introduced in 1997 and slightly tweaked in 2000. In my opinion a change to the set is more than necessary.
Also the concept of the "Tagesschau" is different to the one of BBC News. The programme doesn't have presenters but newsreaders. The newsreaders don't use autocue they read straight from the paper. They don't write their scripts themselves. The programme has special scriptwriters.
The concept of the programme is very strict. At the beginning the newsreader says "Good evening" (he isn't allowed to say anything different) and he doesn't say Goodbye at the end. He just says "Our next bulletin will be at ..." and then they cut directly into the closing titles.
The aim of the programme is to deliver the news as it is and not the opinion of the presenter or the editor or whoever.
So I think you really couldn't compare the Tagesschau to BBC News
boring_user_name posted:
Quote:
Good - and thats what they should go back to now. The news bulletins were done properly then, with decent presenters not just chosen to make it seem equal (ie. Madame Raworth). All of the newsreaders had strong commading voices, and you could trust them.
The Nine o Clock News theme tune played - superbly orchestral powerful theme, and you knew you were going to get a half hour of in-depth, global, political, highbrow, important, commanding news. Now its Edwards plodding through the script, in an awful set, with relatively cheesy, tacky in house titles.
I agree also that any changes should be made all in one go, across the board. Not just tinkering with little bits one at time, then by the time you've finished, the tinkering starts back around again in another cycle. Total relaunches appear to be the best.
I agree. News should have authorative, uncluttered titles to grab attention, and only use graphics during the programme to improve clarity.
In terms of presentation, I think ard (the German BBC) has one of the best formulas: it uses a simple countdown and short authorative titles, and then plunges straight into the news. It is refreshingly informative because it is uncluttered and undistracting.
The programme also has continuity with the past, using the same theme since it's inception in the 1950's!
Also, presenters just wear smart business clothes and sit behing a desk - comfortable for the presenter, and easy for the viewer to watch - allowing the news to take precedence.
http://www.tagesschau.de/sendungen/0,1196,SPM7,00.html
Incidentally, I find it interesting that even the television presentation enthusiasts here find the style of BBC News overkill - god knows how the general population percieve it!
Well I am German and I do watch the "Tagesschau" very often. But I think its set and its titles are very old fashioned. The current look was introduced in 1997 and slightly tweaked in 2000. In my opinion a change to the set is more than necessary.
Also the concept of the "Tagesschau" is different to the one of BBC News. The programme doesn't have presenters but newsreaders. The newsreaders don't use autocue they read straight from the paper. They don't write their scripts themselves. The programme has special scriptwriters.
The concept of the programme is very strict. At the beginning the newsreader says "Good evening" (he isn't allowed to say anything different) and he doesn't say Goodbye at the end. He just says "Our next bulletin will be at ..." and then they cut directly into the closing titles.
The aim of the programme is to deliver the news as it is and not the opinion of the presenter or the editor or whoever.
So I think you really couldn't compare the Tagesschau to BBC News