KI
Same goes for the ubiquitous British royal family whenever they get pregnant, ill or when Prince Harry is up at it again. I can understand the British perspective, for after all: they are a British Broadcaster. But sometimes, it seems, the news channel loses sight of the 'World News' part of its name.
Allow me to ask for some clarification. I've been wandering through the pages of this thread and can't really comprehend whether or to what extend BBC World News will be broadcasting in HD within the near future.
BBC World News - to 14th January 2013
LOL. We're all anxious, it seems.
Shiraz, anyone?
Can't wait for the new countdown either.
From a current content perspective, World led with the Savile story again yesterday, consuming almost half of the bulletin with the story. As I've mentioned before, whilst I would never disagree that it's major story in the UK, still not so sure about a World audience, given some of the other events developing globally yesterday.
But, hey, who am I to question?
Shiraz, anyone?
Can't wait for the new countdown either.
From a current content perspective, World led with the Savile story again yesterday, consuming almost half of the bulletin with the story. As I've mentioned before, whilst I would never disagree that it's major story in the UK, still not so sure about a World audience, given some of the other events developing globally yesterday.
But, hey, who am I to question?
Same goes for the ubiquitous British royal family whenever they get pregnant, ill or when Prince Harry is up at it again. I can understand the British perspective, for after all: they are a British Broadcaster. But sometimes, it seems, the news channel loses sight of the 'World News' part of its name.
Allow me to ask for some clarification. I've been wandering through the pages of this thread and can't really comprehend whether or to what extend BBC World News will be broadcasting in HD within the near future.
Last edited by Kikrokos on 13 January 2013 10:41pm