Do the BBC think that people are really going to watch this instead of Vice, or indeed any decent Youtube channel?
Well, you could argue that about any channel, website or anything. Why wouldn't they? If they have programmes on it that people want to watch then they will. They've got people like Stacey Dooley and Tyger Drew-Honey on it who people know and like and they have the budget to make rather bigger programmes than your average YouTube channel. And why do they need to watch it instead of Vice? They can watch it in addition to it.
The Radio Times is also being misleading suggesting that the drop to about 3 hours of new content a week is actually barely a cut, because in recent weeks/months the linear channel hasn't had much more than 3 hours of new content.
But hasn't the channel been in a run down state for ages now, with limited content as the wheels of the BBC Trust finally deciding what to do run much slower than the programme commissioners?
Well, you can compare the three hours or so it's had recently to what it had ten years ago this week via Genome. How much new British content was it showing in its pomp?
http://genome.ch.bbc.co.uk/schedules/bbcthree/2006-02-11
Saturday - none
Sunday - 1 hour 55 minutes
Monday - 1 hour 30 minutes
Tuesday - 1 hour
Wednesday - 1 hour 30 minutes
Thursday - 1 hour 30 minutes
Friday - 30 minutes
So that's eight hours, the equivalent of just over one hour long show a day. Now bear in mind that in those days the BBC were showing lots more programmes on all channels. They were showing new content on daytime BBC2 and long into the night, for example, because they had lots more money. The BBC have never pretended that they haven't had to make cuts because the licence fee isn't big enough for everything, so yes, there have been fewer BBC3 programmes but you could say the same thing about BBC2, BBC4 and Radio 2, which are not closing down. It also fits in with the BBC's stated remit to do fewer things, but better. So you don't get five episodes a week of Live At Johnny's made for a budget of 50p, for example. So yes, there's less content, but they've never said there wouldn't be. They're not pretending they closed this channel down on a whim.
And in any case, three hours of new British content is pretty much what we get from Sky 1 on a good week, and that's a channel that's coining it in. The other week Sky 1 had one hour of new British content.