its amazing how only bbc have such issues, rather then missing about switching 1080i and 1080p that they actually concentrate on sorting their HD out so it broadcasts at 1920x1080i and making their productions look sharp, Sky do it, pictures from the EBU are correct as well, so why are the BBC behind.
Probably because almost all BBC production is still shot on DVC Pro HD or HD Cam camcorders, which run at 1440x1080 on-tape (or P2 if shooting DVC Pro on P2) so there is zero benefit to broadcasting in 1920x1080 for this content. Similarly many BBC productions post-produced in the BBC Production village will transcode to DVC Pro HD for post production. Programmes using EVS servers for "
VT" replay are also quite likely to be using DVC Pro HD as their codec - again 1440x1080.
More recent stuff is being shot on XD Cam HD 422 or AVC Intra 100 - which is 1920x1080 (though may well be edited DVC Pro HD) - and some high-end drama is 1920x1080 acquired. However the bulk of non-live output is still 1440x1080.
Many countries are using 1440x1080 - Japan does, France does, and quite a few countries in Europe are 720p which is only 1280 horizontally (NRK in Norway, SVT in Sweden, ARD, ZDF and Arte in Germany) All the Freeview HD stuff is 1440x1080, as are the Freesat versions of ITV1 HD ISTR.
It's a balancing act of bitrate vs resolution. Personally I'd rather have slightly reduced horizontal resolution - which is irrelevant for the bulk of BBC HD output currently - rather than more visible compression artefacts.
One reason people "think" Sky looks better for their live content is that they wind a LOT more artificial detail into their pictures (particularly on sport) than the BBC or ITV. Personally I hate it - but then people run with their sharpness settings at the default setting on their TV (masking loads of high frequency detail)...