What I posted previously was NOT a lie, but was based on information I was given from someone close to the action. FACT. I am rather offended by your comments above, and I feel that for me to be given my marching orders because I posted a credible piece of information from what I have so far found to be a reliable and accurate source, is wrong and somewhat wide of the mark.
After all, I thought that rumours and gossip and inside information was "partially" (and within the confines of legality and libel, etc) what this forum was all about???
I am sorry to disappoint you, if you are perhaps considering that I am another bored teenager who has nothing better to do. That actually couldn't be farther from reality.
And could you perhaps - in the interests of a balanced view - tell everyone else reading exactly WHY I should be given my marching orders? Because Moira did not present a news bulletin???
I'm backing James on this. He shouldn't be banned for expressing his opinions on how the shifts could work, or indeed whether or not Moira Stuart might be presenting a news bulletin. For God's sake.... does it really matter that much to people if she isn't on our screens for one week?