MQ
I'm a bit bemused that some people seem to think Eurovision is
only now
being politicised. As best I can tell, Ukraine's winning entry in 2016 was pretty political -- a (not exactly unwarranted) F-U to the Russians over their invasion of Crimea. And I suspect at least some of the public votes towards Ukraine in 2016 were informed by sympathy around events in that country -- just as, I'm sure, votes towards 3rd-placed Russia were aided by political sentiment too.
The question for me is this: if the shoe were on the other foot, and Russia had won last year, how much pressure would the EBU have faced not to hold the event there? Would, for example, the Netherlands have been willing to send a contestant, given what happened with MH17? Or in light of regular media commentary suggesting Russia is "hacking" and influencing elections in the US and Europe, how eager would France and Germany be to let Putin host a European glamourfest? How many viewers across the continent might choose to boycott watching the event?
It is virtually impossible to shield events like Eurovision from any political context/implications. That would require the general rules of human nature to be suspended.
The question for me is this: if the shoe were on the other foot, and Russia had won last year, how much pressure would the EBU have faced not to hold the event there? Would, for example, the Netherlands have been willing to send a contestant, given what happened with MH17? Or in light of regular media commentary suggesting Russia is "hacking" and influencing elections in the US and Europe, how eager would France and Germany be to let Putin host a European glamourfest? How many viewers across the continent might choose to boycott watching the event?
It is virtually impossible to shield events like Eurovision from any political context/implications. That would require the general rules of human nature to be suspended.