BA
You are thinking on a completely different wavelength.
If you actually took the time to read and comprehend my post, you'd understand that I was directly responding to you trying to insult most of the membership of this forum.
I am, and I still don't agree with you.
If people had actually read what I had written then it is clear that the programmes would be shown on a DEDICATED TV channel rather than an existing TV channel, so why on earth anybody needed to bring LWT and TV-AM into the discussion I don't know because it's a complete irrelevance.
I stated that it would be have been run by the predecessors of the DFE. It would not be a conventional commercial channel funded by advertising, so factors like advertising revenue and viewing ratings are immaterial.
Schools programming is a title that explains itself - programming for schools. Quite what would have been gained from your harebrained idea, other than unnecessary expense, is beyond me.
Children's educational programmes are hardly high culture. The sort of people who want their children to become cultured and intellectual aren't going to be sitting them in front of the TV in order to become that way.
You are thinking on a completely different wavelength.
If you actually took the time to read and comprehend my post, you'd understand that I was directly responding to you trying to insult most of the membership of this forum.
How many people on this forum are seriously interested in documentaries, educational programmes, and even highbrow arts[...]?
I am, and I still don't agree with you.
There are no programmes intended for 8 to 14 year olds on the main channels because they're on dedicated channels. You just said it yourself. If they were on the main channels during primetime, then adults wouldn't watch.
If people had actually read what I had written then it is clear that the programmes would be shown on a DEDICATED TV channel rather than an existing TV channel, so why on earth anybody needed to bring LWT and TV-AM into the discussion I don't know because it's a complete irrelevance.
Quote:
Like it's been said many times, this isn't how commercial television works.
I stated that it would be have been run by the predecessors of the DFE. It would not be a conventional commercial channel funded by advertising, so factors like advertising revenue and viewing ratings are immaterial.
Schools programming is a title that explains itself - programming for schools. Quite what would have been gained from your harebrained idea, other than unnecessary expense, is beyond me.