MA
HTV, Central and TVS were franchised as Dual Regions throughout the 80's (HTV a lot longer before that of course). As Steve said above, Central introduced the third sub region and then that became a requirement of whoever bid for the midlands in 1991.
Stations like Yorkshire and Anglia introduced their own split news but these weren't 'dual regions' and weren't a requirement of the licenses in 1991. Although of course a bidder who didn't offer to continue the practise might have risked getting marked down for it by the ITC, indeed many bidders offered to do more split news including Westcountry and Meridian
Yes, beyond the dual Central, HTV, and TVS/Meridian regions, there was nor regulatory requirement to provide anything 'smaller'.
As part of TVS's 1991 renewal proposals, they intended to add a sub regional opt for Brighton, run along similar lines to the 5 min sub opt for the Thames Valley (Hannington) (presented from the continuity studio at Southampton) and East Sussex (Heathfield) (presented from the continuity studio in Maidstone).
Of course they lost to Meridan, who instead expanded the Thames Valley opt into a full third sub region, and built a studio in Newbury to present it from.
I think they dropped the Heathfield opt totally ?
Of course Meridian later took advantage of those dedicated transmitter feeds to provide local ads, which remain to this day, and will live on far longer I suspect than those 'Trojan Horse' news services
What evidence is there that any sub-regional details were included in any franchise requirement? And why would Central bidders be put off, when there was no shortage of interest in the HTV, Yorkshire, Anglia or Meridian areas, all of whom operated similar sub-regional structures?
HTV, Central and TVS were franchised as Dual Regions throughout the 80's (HTV a lot longer before that of course). As Steve said above, Central introduced the third sub region and then that became a requirement of whoever bid for the midlands in 1991.
Stations like Yorkshire and Anglia introduced their own split news but these weren't 'dual regions' and weren't a requirement of the licenses in 1991. Although of course a bidder who didn't offer to continue the practise might have risked getting marked down for it by the ITC, indeed many bidders offered to do more split news including Westcountry and Meridian
Yes, beyond the dual Central, HTV, and TVS/Meridian regions, there was nor regulatory requirement to provide anything 'smaller'.
As part of TVS's 1991 renewal proposals, they intended to add a sub regional opt for Brighton, run along similar lines to the 5 min sub opt for the Thames Valley (Hannington) (presented from the continuity studio at Southampton) and East Sussex (Heathfield) (presented from the continuity studio in Maidstone).
Of course they lost to Meridan, who instead expanded the Thames Valley opt into a full third sub region, and built a studio in Newbury to present it from.
I think they dropped the Heathfield opt totally ?
Of course Meridian later took advantage of those dedicated transmitter feeds to provide local ads, which remain to this day, and will live on far longer I suspect than those 'Trojan Horse' news services
