MA
Yes, as I mentioned briefly up-thread, I will be very interested to see how the play has been adapted to a TV drama.
Way back in this thread are my thoughts upon going to see the play in June 2018. It was a very astute (and well-staged) appraisal of TV game show formats, with lots of pastiches of cheesy 80s gameshows thrown in, as the story of how WWTBAM was created played out. Around all that came the Ingrams' story, with the first half being the 'prosecution' and the second half the 'defence'. Perhaps because the two sides of the story were played in that order, one left the theatre feeling a degree of doubt in the certainty of the prosecution.
Each member of the audience had a '50:50'-style handset and were invited to vote 'Innocent' or 'Guilty' as the play's conclusion, and the night that I was there it hit precisely 50% for each, which was exciting and led to gasps from the audience! (I had wondered if that was rigged to happen every night, but as we left the screens were showing the results from previous nights, so unless those were faked it has to be presumed that I was just there on a night when the result was particularly close.)
It was very much a theatrical piece, and lots of the methods of story-telling wouldn't work on the telly, so I'm looking forward to seeing how it has been reimagined for this medium. I suspect that the two-sided telling of the story (first Celador's side, then the Igrams' side) won't be reprised, as that makes far more sense for a two-half play than a multi-episode TV drama.
The play on which it's based certainly left an element of doubt.
Yes, as I mentioned briefly up-thread, I will be very interested to see how the play has been adapted to a TV drama.
Way back in this thread are my thoughts upon going to see the play in June 2018. It was a very astute (and well-staged) appraisal of TV game show formats, with lots of pastiches of cheesy 80s gameshows thrown in, as the story of how WWTBAM was created played out. Around all that came the Ingrams' story, with the first half being the 'prosecution' and the second half the 'defence'. Perhaps because the two sides of the story were played in that order, one left the theatre feeling a degree of doubt in the certainty of the prosecution.
Each member of the audience had a '50:50'-style handset and were invited to vote 'Innocent' or 'Guilty' as the play's conclusion, and the night that I was there it hit precisely 50% for each, which was exciting and led to gasps from the audience! (I had wondered if that was rigged to happen every night, but as we left the screens were showing the results from previous nights, so unless those were faked it has to be presumed that I was just there on a night when the result was particularly close.)
It was very much a theatrical piece, and lots of the methods of story-telling wouldn't work on the telly, so I'm looking forward to seeing how it has been reimagined for this medium. I suspect that the two-sided telling of the story (first Celador's side, then the Igrams' side) won't be reprised, as that makes far more sense for a two-half play than a multi-episode TV drama.