A couple of interesting bits:
There was (maybe still is?) the facility for the BBC to take over ITV in the event of an imminent war. I can believe that of the UHF network, but the VHF 405 system didn't have co-sited transmitters, so presumably there would need to be links between the sites to enable this to happen? Unless it would use off air transmission? Either way, however this was achieved technically, surely the fact that the engineering to do this existed would arouse suspicion as to what this seemingly redundant facility would ever be used for?
It would also seem to be a flaw in the plan to decide the Radio 4 Longwave site was unnecessary for their wartime radio service due to the regionalised FM/MW services that would be provided. Firstly, longwave radio would propagate further and be just the ticket if you're in a cellar with the rubble of your collapsed house on top of you. And secondly, surely the last thing you'd want to do is have a single point of failure that would exist by having only 1 service. Having a regionalised service is no use to you if the infrastructure gets destroyed or the regional station fails later. I would've thought it would be better to keep LW going at least until it had been verified that the entire regional network was up and running, but ideally throughout with the national information, with instructions to use the regional service if you can receive it (and providing a roundup of whatever regional information was available for the benefit of those who couldn't receive it).
Oh well, I suspect like much planning for nuclear war, this was all created more to give people something constructive to do in the last few days, rather than any genuine belief that it would work, or even if it did, that it would provide any useful information. I wouldn't need to be listening to an emergency regional service in the dark on a portable radio to know that I'm f**ked.
Last edited by cwathen on 25 July 2016 6:49pm - 2 times in total