TM
It's no denying that broadcasters sometimes can't keep a consistent portfolio of branding across all its outlets, but it's actually pretty rare for it to work the opposite way, where certain services of a broadcaster; (children's, radio and prime-time) are actually given a brand new look, right before a company undergoes a complete brand overhaul.
CITV brought back in-vision continuity with a brand new logo and set in May 1998; a mere 5 months before the "blue-and-yellow" ITV logo was introduced the following October. But that's not all, Daybreak had its final look in September 2012, 4 months before the massive ITV corporate refresh in January the next year. This might be a slight coincidence, but it does make me wonder if ITV treats CITV and Good Morning Britain like shows, rather than the integrals for the company's outlet; (CITV for children's programmes and Good Morning Britain for news and topical affairs) and why they've chosen to brand those strands first, rather than at the height of the company itself undergoing a huge corporate makeover.
CITV brought back in-vision continuity with a brand new logo and set in May 1998; a mere 5 months before the "blue-and-yellow" ITV logo was introduced the following October. But that's not all, Daybreak had its final look in September 2012, 4 months before the massive ITV corporate refresh in January the next year. This might be a slight coincidence, but it does make me wonder if ITV treats CITV and Good Morning Britain like shows, rather than the integrals for the company's outlet; (CITV for children's programmes and Good Morning Britain for news and topical affairs) and why they've chosen to brand those strands first, rather than at the height of the company itself undergoing a huge corporate makeover.
Last edited by ToasterMan on 2 August 2017 6:26pm - 2 times in total