DO
No it wouldn't, it would provide a "window" in the middle of the set, the national set doesn't look like that at all. This new design provides that window all the way around the set, which is just like the national set. Yeah, it's a bit short, but it'd look better on camera.
Oh come on, there's millions of places in the UK which look good in panoramic pictures.
If viewers didn't appreciate consistency we wouldn't have regular presenters, or logos, or brands.
Projectors in studios are a pain. The lamps are expensive, they cause untold issues with lighting, they're require constant adjustment and they don't look as good as a TV screen. If the current crop of large screen TVs were available when the current sets were built I'm confident they wouldn't have put in the projectors. The only reason to keep them now would be because you can't afford to do the job properly.
I can't think of a single way, integrated into this set design, where that would look better than what they've chosen. Besides, they're not going for a single, middle of the room window like the current design, they're going for a wide panoramic view - a big advantage of which is it gives you a lot more flexibility with camera positioning without worrying about framing the "window" so it doesn't look stupid.
Anyway, the new set design looks to be much more flexible than the old design. I think this looks really nice:
http://news.images.itv.com/image/file/618103/stream_img.jpg
Well, let me put it this way, the national branding isn't made up of 5 LCD a screens, the current projection screens would much better match the national set, with a white bare top and bottom.
No it wouldn't, it would provide a "window" in the middle of the set, the national set doesn't look like that at all. This new design provides that window all the way around the set, which is just like the national set. Yeah, it's a bit short, but it'd look better on camera.
With the wide angle filming, I wasn't meaning what cameras they were using, but getting the landscape looking nice with that wide a angle.
Oh come on, there's millions of places in the UK which look good in panoramic pictures.
And to keep everything consistent, which many viewers won't notice, yet be bothered about, we will roll out a design with ugly black bars.
If viewers didn't appreciate consistency we wouldn't have regular presenters, or logos, or brands.
Would the projections screens last another five years, well they've lasted ten, and probably have been replaced within that time anyway, so perhaps not.
Projectors in studios are a pain. The lamps are expensive, they cause untold issues with lighting, they're require constant adjustment and they don't look as good as a TV screen. If the current crop of large screen TVs were available when the current sets were built I'm confident they wouldn't have put in the projectors. The only reason to keep them now would be because you can't afford to do the job properly.
...and three 103 plasmas on their side? Well they'd create the window look they're going for...
I can't think of a single way, integrated into this set design, where that would look better than what they've chosen. Besides, they're not going for a single, middle of the room window like the current design, they're going for a wide panoramic view - a big advantage of which is it gives you a lot more flexibility with camera positioning without worrying about framing the "window" so it doesn't look stupid.
Anyway, the new set design looks to be much more flexible than the old design. I think this looks really nice:
http://news.images.itv.com/image/file/618103/stream_img.jpg