JJ
Juicy Joe
Founding member
But, if there was no tie in the judges vote - so if they had been given scores of 3, 2 and 1, then all 3 dancers could gain a total of 4 points at the end - 3 points being given to the person who had scored 1, 2 points to 2 and 1 point to the person who had scored 3.
Then they would all be tied again and would all go through to the final.
OR, the person who had scored 1 could not avoid being in the dance off again if they were given 3 points by the public and the person with 3 points had been given 2 points by the public. Again, the bottom placed contestant by the judges could not avoid being in the dacne off in this situation.
SO - what did they do this time last year to avoid this from happening? I can't believe anyone at the BBC could not have envisaged such a pointless vote last night?
Then they would all be tied again and would all go through to the final.
OR, the person who had scored 1 could not avoid being in the dance off again if they were given 3 points by the public and the person with 3 points had been given 2 points by the public. Again, the bottom placed contestant by the judges could not avoid being in the dacne off in this situation.
SO - what did they do this time last year to avoid this from happening? I can't believe anyone at the BBC could not have envisaged such a pointless vote last night?