The over-emphasis on "human interest"... the return to sensational words... the reintroduction of weird and wonderful story names in the headline sequence... the generic-isation of News at Ten... I'm beginning to think parts of this revamp are huge steps backward. Criticise me all you want, but that's my feeling so far (yes I know we're only three days in). That said, I'm willing to sit back and watch how things pan out over the coming weeks and months. Will be a huge shame if they've returned to their "bad" ways.
Very true, ITV News had the balance right until last week, all of the bulletins had their own voice and you knew what to expect and for me I highly regarded News At Ten for being one of the best News bulletins on TV, due to it's editorial concept and it's presentation, it felt very high quality ITN, without being trounced with ITV News from all over.
I'll still watch News At Ten, but it doesn't feel and look right at all, just feels like ITV News have given up or taken a step back to save a few quid.
If I want human interest I'll be a crappy women's glossy magazine or watch something like Five News, but it shouldn't be like that from ITV News.
I wonder what Michael Grade thinks, as it was him who ordered the return of News At Ten and the return of everything associated with it, and it's own identity from the rest of ITV News.