Whether the programme name includes ITV or not is irrelevant. The lack of "ITV" may make some people think they're getting a better product, but at the end of the day it's still produced by exactly the same people and organisation that produce the ITV News bulletins. Any perceived differences are all in your head, not reality.
It is also produced by the same people as produce Channel 4 News.
Perception may be in my head, or in anyone elses, but it is important.
Is ITV really as bad as everyone thinks? Probably not.
Has TV really been dumbed down a lot? Maybe.
But the important thing is perception is important, and ITV is perceived as being a lower quality product.
I am also not necessarily talking about ITN replacing ITV. News at Ten had neither, only an ITN credit at the end.
What I am saying is that "News at Ten" as a brand is better thought of than "ITV News" as a brand. I was not bringing ITN into it at all.